
Quadro P2200

Radeon Pro 5600M
Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅26.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386 | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz+45% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2200 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1 | 186.5+49% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5600M (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 12 |
| Release | June 10 2019 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #281 | #283 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















