Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020

Why buy it

  • 26.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2200 instead at 9,386 vs 9,324, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
G3D Mark Score
9,386
9,324
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
16 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1280
2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.822 TFLOPS
5.274 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock
1493 MHz+45%
1030 MHz
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
80
160+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
4 MB+220%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2200 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
VRAM Capacity
5 GB
8 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
4 MB+220%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCN 2.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
201mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90°C
Perf/Watt
125.1
186.5+49%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5600M (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon Pro 5600M
MSRP
$429
Codename
GP106
Navi 12
Release
June 10 2019
June 15 2020
Ranking
#281
#283

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.