G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2200 vs RTX A2000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2200 vs RTX A2000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅23.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌26.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A2000 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (9,506 vs 9,386), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A2000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A2000 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2200 vs RTX A2000 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1687 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	9,386	9,506+1%
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	16 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280	2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS	8.637 TFLOPS+126%
Boost Clock	1493 MHz	1687 MHz+13%
ROPs	40	48+20%
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	2.5 MB+432%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 Mobile carries 4 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2200 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Mobile. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) — the RTX A2000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 23.5% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
TDP	75W-21%	95W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	201mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	125.1+25%	100.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A2000 Mobile (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	Quadro P2200	RTX A2000 Mobile
MSRP	$429	—
Codename	GP106	GA107
Release	June 10 2019	April 12 2021
Ranking	#281	#273

Search Quadro P2200 on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.