Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro P2200

CPUCPUGPUGPU

GRID P40-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro P2200 Performance Spectrum

GRID P40-2Q
4 GB 225
9,581
+2.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 670
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Quadro P2200
5 GB 75
9,386
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce MX570 A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    1228.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $5,270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1201.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅GRID P40-2Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P2200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (9,581 vs 9,386), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 5 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,270 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $5,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1201.4% (21.9 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-2Q

The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the Quadro P2200 reaches 9,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
G3D Mark Score
9,581+2%
9,386
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2048+60%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+26%
3.822 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1493 MHz+27%
ROPs
64+60%
40
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
768 KB+60%
480 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-2Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
5 GB+25%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
Encoder
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
6th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
201mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
42.6
125.1+194%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-2Q came in at $5699, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. On MSRP, Quadro P2200 was 92.5% cheaper ($5270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 offers 1188.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2200 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P40-2QQuadro P2200
MSRP
$5699
$429-92%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
21.9+1188%
Codename
GM204
GP106
Release
August 30 2015
June 10 2019
Ranking
#433
#281
Search GRID P40-2Q on AmazonSearch Quadro P2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.