Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz

Radeon R9 Fury

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro P2200

9,386

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce MX570 A

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Radeon R9 Fury

275

9,521

+1.4%

Radeon RX 6300

Radeon R9 380X

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank #72 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

98%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

82%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

82%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

80%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

80%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

77%

#57

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

675%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

100%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

100%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

99%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P2200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (5 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 Fury offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 360.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+360.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon R9 Fury

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon R9 Fury

The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
G3D Mark Score	9,386	9,521+1%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	3584+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS	7.168 TFLOPS+88%
Boost Clock	1493 MHz+49%	1000 MHz
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	80	224+180%
L1 Cache	480 KB	896 KB+87%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury has 4 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Bus Width	256-bit	4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	201mm	195mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	125.1+262%	34.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 Fury costs 78% less ($177 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 190.4 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury offers 361% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).