
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank #72 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 590 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 590 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 246.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+246.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon RX 590

Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386 | 9,315 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2304+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1545 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 576 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 590 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 80% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 201mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+135% | 53.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279 and now averages $65. The Radeon RX 590 costs 71.4% less ($162 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 143.3 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 247% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $279-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $227 | $65-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 143.3+247% |
| Codename | GP106 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | June 10 2019 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #281 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















