Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro P2200
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is positioned at rank 60 and the Quadro P2200 is on rank 72, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $227 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($227) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and Quadro P2200
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Quadro P2200 reaches 9,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493+1% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+120% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+37% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+860% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 5 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+860% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 201mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 201mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 125.1+71% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429 and now averages $227. The Quadro P2200 costs 40.3% less ($153 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 41.3 (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 offers 65.2% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-11% | $429 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $227-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 41.3+65% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GP106 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #275 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and Quadro P2200
