Intel Arc Pro A60
Quadro P2200
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro P2200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro P2200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
- ❌19.9% longer card at 241mm vs 201mm.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 241mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌12.9% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Quadro P2200 reaches 9,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493+1% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+120% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+37% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+860% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A60 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 5 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+860% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 201mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 201mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 125.1+71% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro A60 came in at $380, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro A60 was 11.4% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 14.2% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-11% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+14% | 21.9 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GP106 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #275 | #281 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and Quadro P2200
