Intel Arc Pro A60
Quadro M5000
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro M5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro M5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro M5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $619 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌162.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Quadro M5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Quadro M5000 reaches 9,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 9,406 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+97% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+97% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000 carries 8 GB. Quadro M5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A60 and 256-bit on the Quadro M5000. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-13% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0+16% | 62.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro A60 came in at $380, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro A60 was 62% cheaper ($619 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 9.4 (Quadro M5000) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 166% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-62% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+166% | 9.4 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GM204 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #275 | #280 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and Quadro M5000
