Arc Pro A60 vs RTX A2000 Mobile

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Intel Arc Pro A60

130

9,493

0.0%

Iris Pro Graphics P580

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

9,506

+0.1%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

TITAN V CEO Edition

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is positioned at rank 60 and the RTX A2000 Mobile is on rank 214, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

100%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

93%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

92%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

92%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

88%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

86%

#45

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

591%

#60

Intel Arc Pro A60

MSRP: $380|Avg: $380

100%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

96%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

95%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

89%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

88%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

87%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

90%

#204

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

434%

#206

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

393%

#207

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

392%

#211

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

357%

#212

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

354%

#214

RTX A2000 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

97%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

94%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

93%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

91%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A2000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.

Insight	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro A60 Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Mobile Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and RTX A2000 Mobile

Intel Arc Pro A60

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1687 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Mobile) with 256 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	9,493	9,506
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2048	2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.397 TFLOPS	8.637 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+22%	1687 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	128+60%	80
L2 Cache	12 MB+500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	16	20+25%
Tensor Cores	256+220%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	12 MB+500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder	Intel Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Intel Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 31.1% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A60	RTX A2000 Mobile
TDP	130W	95W-27%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	73.0	100.1+37%