Intel Arc Pro A60
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌91% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌21.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 107W.
- ❌40.1% longer card at 241mm vs 172mm.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 107W instead of 130W, a 23W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 241mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) with 256 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 9,603+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+46% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2815 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Intel Arc Pro A60 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A60 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500 XT. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 19.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 172mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 107W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 89.7+23% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro A60 came in at $380, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6500 XT was 47.6% cheaper ($181 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon RX 6500 XT offers 93.2% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | $199-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 48.3+93% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | Navi 24 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #275 | #270 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and Radeon RX 6500 XT
