Intel Arc Pro A60 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is positioned at rank 60 and the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is on rank 110, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 153.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+153.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile reaches 9,494 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 9,494 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+37% | 1500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile's 60W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 60W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 158.2+117% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 63.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile offers 153.2% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $150-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 63.3+153% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GN20-P0 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #275 | #286 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
