
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is positioned at rank #60 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Intel Arc Pro A60 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $42 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 802.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+802.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 9,469 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+57% | 5.345 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+121% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+700% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+700% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-10% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0+93% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 88.9% less ($338 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 802% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-46% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $42-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 225.5+802% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | GK110B |
| Release | June 6 2023 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #275 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















