G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 590 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 195mm instead of 241mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
132.6% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$279 MSRP

Radeon RX 590

2018

Why buy it

✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌23.6% longer card at 241mm vs 195mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 590 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 Fury X instead at 9,382 vs 9,315, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 590 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 Fury X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 590 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $370 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 131% (33.4 vs 14.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 590 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 590

The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Fury X scores 9,382 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
G3D Mark Score	9,382	9,315
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4096+78%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.602 TFLOPS+21%	7.119 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1545 MHz+47%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	256+78%	144
L1 Cache	1 MB+79%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 Fury X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 590 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 590.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	HBM	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+100%	256 GB/s
Bus Width	4096-bit+1500%	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
DirectX	12.0	12.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 6.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon RX 590 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
TDP	275W	175W-36%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	8-pin
Length	195mm	241mm
Height	115mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	60°C-25%	80°C
Perf/Watt	34.1	53.2+56%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 Fury X came in at $649, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 590 was 57% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 130.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 590 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	Radeon RX 590
MSRP	$649	$279-57%
Performance per Dollar	14.5	33.4+130%
Codename	Fiji	Polaris 30
Release	June 24 2015	November 15 2018
Ranking	#282	#285

Search Radeon R9 Fury X on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 590 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.