Radeon Pro 5600M vs Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 5600M vs Radeon R9 Fury X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5600M vs Radeon R9 Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5600M vs Radeon R9 Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 275W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • 4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 450% higher power demand at 275W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Fury X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (9,382 vs 9,324), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Fury X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Fury X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5600M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 5600M vs Radeon R9 Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5600M scores 9,324 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5600M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,324
9,382
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.274 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+63%
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
1050 MHz+2%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
256+60%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5600M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM
Bus Width
128-bit
4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5600M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 138.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 60°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
TDP
50W-82%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
195mm
Height
0mm
115mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
60°C-33%
Perf/Watt
186.5+447%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5600M (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5600MRadeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$649
Codename
Navi 12
Fiji
Release
June 15 2020
June 24 2015
Ranking
#283
#282

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.