GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5600M

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz

Similar parts

·····

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5600M Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

3 GB 250

9,469

+1.6%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

TITAN V CEO Edition

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Radeon Pro 5600M

8 GB 50

9,324

0.0%

Radeon HD 8990

Radeon R9 380X

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020

Why buy it

✅13.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 5600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 780 Ti instead at 9,469 vs 9,324, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 780 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5600M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Pro 5600M

The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
G3D Mark Score	9,469+2%	9,324
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2880+13%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+1%	5.274 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1030 MHz+11%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	240+50%	160
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	8 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 90°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
TDP	250W	50W-80%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	83°C-8%	90°C
Perf/Watt	37.9	186.5+392%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5600M (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	Radeon Pro 5600M
MSRP	$699	—
Codename	GK110B	Navi 12
Release	November 7 2013	June 15 2020
Ranking	#278	#283

Search GeForce GTX 780 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.