Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023Core: 900 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon Pro 5600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon Pro 5600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro 5600M

2020

Why buy it

  • 12.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Intel Arc Pro A60 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $380 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro A60 instead at 9,493 vs 9,324, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro A60 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A60 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 5600M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon Pro 5600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5600M

The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
G3D Mark Score
9,493+2%
9,324
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2048
2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS+59%
5.274 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+99%
1030 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
160+25%
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A60 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
Encoder
Intel Xe Media Engine
VCN 2.0
Decoder
Intel Xe Media Engine
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
TDP
130W
50W-62%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90°C
Perf/Watt
73.0
186.5+155%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon Pro 5600M
MSRP
$380
Codename
DG2-256
Navi 12
Release
June 6 2023
June 15 2020
Ranking
#275
#283

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.