
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro A60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro A60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro A60 better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and Radeon Pro 5600M

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493+2% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+59% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+99% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 186.5+155% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | — |
| Codename | DG2-256 | Navi 12 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #275 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













