Radeon RX 460 (móvel) vs FirePro W7000 Adapter
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Popular choices:
FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is positioned at rank 103 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter is on rank 219, so the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460 (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $45), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 220.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+220.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 (móvel) and FirePro W7000 Adapter
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.
FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) scores 4,100 versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 4,383 — the FirePro W7000 Adapter leads by 6.9%. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Raw compute: 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,100 | 4,383+7% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.115 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+15% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) draws 55W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-63% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.5+155% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 and now averages $15. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 66.7% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 91.1 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 220.7% better value. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-89% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $15-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.1 | 292.2+221% |
| Codename | Baffin | Pitcairn |
| Release | August 8 2016 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #499 | #477 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 460 (móvel) and FirePro W7000 Adapter
