
Radeon RX 460 (móvel) vs Tesla K20Xm

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is positioned at rank 103 and the Tesla K20Xm is on rank 100, so the Tesla K20Xm offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20Xm
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K20Xm is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460 (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $7,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 15831.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15831.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($7,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 (móvel) and Tesla K20Xm

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) scores 4,100 versus the Tesla K20Xm's 4,403 — the Tesla K20Xm leads by 7.4%. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,100 | 4,403+7% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2688+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.115 TFLOPS | 3.935 TFLOPS+86% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 224+300% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm has 6 GB. The Tesla K20Xm offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the Tesla K20Xm has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) draws 55W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 124.1% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-77% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 74.5+298% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-99% | $7699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | — |
| Codename | Baffin | GK110 |
| Release | August 8 2016 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #499 | #473 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















