Radeon RX 460 (móvel) vs Quadro M2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is positioned at rank #103 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#93

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

262%

#95

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

238%

#96

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

237%

#100

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

216%

#101

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

214%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

99%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

99%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

97%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

94%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

92%

#117

GeForce MX570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $120

92%

#118

Radeon RX 6500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $50), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 13.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+13.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($45)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Quadro M2000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 (móvel) and Quadro M2000

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) scores 4,100 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 1180 MHz vs 1163 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
G3D Mark Score	4,100+2%	4,026
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+17%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.115 TFLOPS+18%	1.786 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1180 MHz+1%	1163 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	224 KB	288 KB+29%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
Encoder	VCE 3.4	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) draws 55W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)	Quadro M2000
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	74.5+39%	53.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 91.1 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 13.2% better value.