Radeon RX 5500M
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

2019Core: 1375 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 5500M is positioned at rank #46 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#36
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
182%
#38
165%
#39
165%
#43
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
150%
#44
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
149%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
100%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
99%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
98%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
98%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 32.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5500M.

InsightRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-32.2%)
Leading raw performance (+32.2%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $100 for the Radeon RX 5500M, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 76.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+76.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 32.2%. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
5,954
7,869+32%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1408+57%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.632 TFLOPS+55%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1665 MHz+1%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
88+57%
56
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s+75%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCN 2.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
VCN 2.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
85W
75W-12%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
70.0
104.9+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 76.3% better value.

FeatureRadeon RX 5500MGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$75-25%
Performance per Dollar
59.5
104.9+76%
Codename
Navi 14
TU117
Release
October 7 2019
April 23 2019
Ranking
#400
#323