
Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 680MX

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and GeForce GTX 680MX

Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the GeForce GTX 680MX reaches 3,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 680MX uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,799+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (Kepler). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560) vs H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC (Kepler) |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 680MX's 122W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-39% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70 C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 49.1+58% | 31.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | — |
| Release | April 18 2017 | October 23 2012 |
| Ranking | #527 | #520 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











