
Radeon RX 560 vs P104-100

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:

P104-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P104-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $60), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 499.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+499.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and P104-100

Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,678 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | 1733 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 720 KB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 560 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the P104-100 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.1 | 122.6+150% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the P104-100 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The P104-100 costs 83.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs 367.8 (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers 499% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $10-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.4 | 367.8+499% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GP104 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #527 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











