Radeon RX 560
VS
P104-100

Radeon RX 560 vs P104-100

AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
VS

P104-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.

InsightRadeon RX 560P104-100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P104-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $60), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 499.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 560P104-100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+499.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and P104-100

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 560P104-100
G3D Mark Score
3,682
3,678
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1024
1920+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.611 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS+155%
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1733 MHz+36%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
64
120+88%
L1 Cache
256 KB
720 KB+181%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 560P104-100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the P104-100 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560P104-100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560P104-100
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70 C
Perf/Watt
49.1
122.6+150%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the P104-100 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The P104-100 costs 83.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs 367.8 (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers 499% better value.

FeatureRadeon RX 560P104-100
MSRP
$99
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$10-83%
Performance per Dollar
61.4
367.8+499%
Codename
Polaris 21
GP104
Release
April 18 2017
December 12 2017
Ranking
#527
#529