Radeon RX 560 vs Quadro P620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

99%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

83%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

83%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

81%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

81%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

78%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

76%

#59

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

679%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

100%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

79%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P620 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 560 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $60 for the Radeon RX 560, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 25.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+25.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

Quadro P620 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and Quadro P620

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score	3,682	3,698
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024+100%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.611 TFLOPS+77%	1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1275 MHz	1443 MHz+13%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
Encoder	VCE 3.4	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC
Codecs	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro P620
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	145mm
Height	112mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70 C	70°C
Perf/Watt	49.1	92.5+88%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170 and now averages $48. The Quadro P620 costs 20% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs 77.0 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 25.4% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).