Radeon RX 5600 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 49.4% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+49.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-49.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 5600, it costs 50% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 33.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5600 and GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5600 scores 11,753 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon RX 5600 leads by 49.4%. The Radeon RX 5600 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1265 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,753+49% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.829 TFLOPS+95% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | 1665 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5600 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+125% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5600 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5600) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.4 | 104.9+34% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.4 (Radeon RX 5600) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 33.8% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $149-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $75-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.4 | 104.9+34% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU117 |
| Release | July 7 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #295 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5600 and GeForce GTX 1650
