
Radeon RX 5600M vs CMP 40HX

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:

CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5600M is positioned at rank 32 and the CMP 40HX is on rank 119, so the Radeon RX 5600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600M
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5600M and CMP 40HX

Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5600M scores 8,857 and the CMP 40HX reaches 8,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5600M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 1265 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,857+1% | 8,749 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.829 TFLOPS | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | 1650 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5600M comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 40HX has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 5600M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 4 MB (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs No.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | No |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5600M draws 150W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.0+25% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU106 |
| Release | July 7 2020 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #295 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















