Radeon RX 5600M vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 5600M is positioned at rank #32 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5600M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Radeon RX 5600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5600M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5600M and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5600M scores 8,857 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5600M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 1265 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,857 | 9,177+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2880+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.829 TFLOPS+3% | 5.645 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1265 MHz+29% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5600M draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5600M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.0+61% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5600M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GK110B |
| Release | July 7 2020 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #295 | #288 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5600M and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
