Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
VS
Radeon Pro Vega 16

Radeon RX 560X (móvel) vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018Core: 1275 MHzBoost: 1202 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is positioned at rank #18 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

#8
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
124%
#10
113%
#11
112%
#15
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
102%
#16
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
102%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560X (móvel) and Radeon Pro Vega 16

AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) scores 4,800 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1202 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score
4,800
4,809
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.611 TFLOPS+7%
2.437 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1202 MHz+1%
1190 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) draws 65W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
TDP
65W-13%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
73.8+15%
64.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureRadeon RX 560X (móvel)Radeon Pro Vega 16
MSRP
$55
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$55
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
87.3
Infinity
Codename
Polaris 21
Vega 12
Release
April 11 2018
November 14 2018
Ranking
#483
#451