
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Comparing the mobile Radeon Pro Vega 16 to the high-end GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER illustrates the absolute widest gap in current digital technology. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute muscle, moving from a specialized MacBook chip of 2018 to a world-class monster that masters uncompromised 4K Ultra gaming with ease.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features a massive 16GB of dedicated fast memory and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a legacy mobile solution and lacks the core count or bandwidth to handle modern software with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy graphics to a 40-series Ti SUPER powered tower is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual stability needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and detail that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is now strictly piece of hardware history on legacy laptops. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 459.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 16.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+459.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-459.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro Vega 16

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 4,809 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 459.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+460% | 4,809 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+475% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1096% | 2.437 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+108% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+110% | 64.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD104 | Vega 12 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #32 | #451 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














