
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon Sky 500
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) vs Radeon Sky 500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) vs Radeon Sky 500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) vs Radeon Sky 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 823.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Radeon Sky 500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Sky 500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Sky 500
2013Why buy it
- ✅6.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌809.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) vs Radeon Sky 500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) scores 4,800 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800+2% | 4,723 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS+7% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Sky 500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) and 64-bit on the Radeon Sky 500. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) draws 65W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 73.8+134% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) came in at $55, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X (móvel) was 89% cheaper ($445 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 828.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-89% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3+829% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 11 2018 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #483 | #455 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














