
Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌445.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌445.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M395 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than Radeon R9 M395?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M395 scores 4,934 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395 is built on GCN while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,934+3% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M395 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — a 57.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s+57% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M395 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 65W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 65.8 | 73.8+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 81.7% less ($245 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 432.3% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $55-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | 87.3+432% |
| Codename | — | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 9 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #445 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












