Quadro T1000 (móvel)
VS
Radeon R9 M395

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 139 and the Radeon R9 M395 is on rank 283, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
90%
#123
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1477%
#138
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
100%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
100%
#140
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
99%
#141
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
99%
#142
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
98%
#143
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
96%
#144
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#145
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#146
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
94%
#147
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
92%
#148
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
92%
#150
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
91%
#151
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
91%
#153
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
94%
#273
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
660%
#275
598%
#276
597%
#280
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
543%
#281
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
539%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
99%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
97%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395.

InsightQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M395, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 153.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+153.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($120)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and Radeon R9 M395

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score
5,000+1%
4,934
Architecture
Turing
GCN
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1792+133%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
100.0+52%
65.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 154.3% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro T1000 (móvel)Radeon R9 M395
MSRP
$500
$300-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$120-60%
$300
Performance per Dollar
41.7+154%
16.4
Codename
TU117
Release
May 27 2019
June 9 2015
Ranking
#374
#445