
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 139 and the Radeon R9 M395 is on rank 283, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M395, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 153.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+153.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and Radeon R9 M395

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+1% | 4,934 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+52% | 65.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 154.3% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $300-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-60% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.7+154% | 16.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | — |
| Release | May 27 2019 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #374 | #445 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















