Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (5,000 vs 4,934), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M395 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.5% (16.4 vs 10.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T1000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score	5,000+1%	4,934
Architecture	Turing	GCN
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1792+133%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. Quadro T1000 (móvel) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro T1000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+52%	65.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro T1000 (móvel) came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395 was 40% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 64% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395
MSRP	$500	$300-40%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	16.4+64%
Codename	TU117	—
Release	May 27 2019	June 9 2015
Ranking	#374	#445

Search Quadro T1000 (móvel) on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.