Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Radeon R9 M395X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M395X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M395X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (5,120 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro T1000 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.2% (10.0 vs 8.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M395X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,120+2%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.235 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro T1000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	100.0+46%	68.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro T1000 (móvel) came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 (móvel) was 16.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 17.6% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP	$500-17%	$600
Performance per Dollar	10.0+18%	8.5
Codename	TU117	Amethyst
Release	May 27 2019	May 5 2015
Ranking	#374	#438

Search Quadro T1000 (móvel) on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.