Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M395X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 139 and the Radeon R9 M395X is on rank 391, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

90%

#123

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1477%

#138

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

100%

#140

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

99%

#141

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

99%

#142

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

98%

#143

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

96%

#144

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#145

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

94%

#147

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

92%

#148

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

92%

#150

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

91%

#151

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

#153

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X

#381

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1273%

#383

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1154%

#384

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1151%

#388

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1046%

#389

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1039%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

100%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

99%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

97%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

97%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#400

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

94%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

93%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M395X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 (móvel).

Insight	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $150 for the Radeon R9 M395X, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 22.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+22.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($120)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M395X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and Radeon R9 M395X

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score	5,000	5,120+2%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.235 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro T1000 (móvel)	Radeon R9 M395X
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	100.0+46%	68.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 and now averages $150. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 22.3% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).