
Quadro T1000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 5300M

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 139 and the Radeon RX 5300M is on rank 41, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 5300M

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1445 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,044 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1408+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.235 TFLOPS | 4.069 TFLOPS+82% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1445 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 88+83% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M has 3 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+69% | 59.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















