Arc A370M vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅19.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Arc A370M

2022

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅19.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A370M better than Quadro T1000 (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Arc A370M averages 19.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,115 vs 5,000 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A370M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (35W vs 50W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A370M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 19.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro T1000 (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Arc A370M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro T1000 (móvel) still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Quadro T1000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro T1000 (móvel) is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $500 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Arc A370M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Quadro T1000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
1080p
low	83 FPS	92 FPS
medium	71 FPS	83 FPS
high	58 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	73 FPS	85 FPS
medium	63 FPS	73 FPS
high	46 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	39 FPS
medium	25 FPS	37 FPS
high	17 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	22 FPS

Open Arc A370M Open Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
1080p
low	115 FPS	131 FPS
medium	89 FPS	106 FPS
high	69 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	84 FPS	73 FPS
medium	63 FPS	59 FPS
high	50 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	49 FPS	34 FPS
medium	37 FPS	26 FPS
high	29 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	14 FPS

Open Arc A370M Open Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
1080p
low	230 FPS	225 FPS
medium	184 FPS	180 FPS
high	153 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	169 FPS
medium	138 FPS	135 FPS
high	115 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	115 FPS	112 FPS
medium	92 FPS	90 FPS
high	77 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	51 FPS

Open Arc A370M Open Quadro T1000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
1080p
low	143 FPS	225 FPS
medium	117 FPS	180 FPS
high	99 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	105 FPS	169 FPS
medium	88 FPS	135 FPS
high	75 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	102 FPS
medium	49 FPS	76 FPS
high	39 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	52 FPS

Open Arc A370M Open Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	5,115+2%	5,000
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+42%	2.235 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1550 MHz+7%	1455 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+100%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.