Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014

Why buy it

  • 32.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $450 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 48% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (5,000 vs 4,934), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M395 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 48% (16.4 vs 11.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureRadeon R9 M295X Mac EditionRadeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score
5,000+1%
4,934
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+14%
1792
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M295X Mac EditionRadeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 1.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295X Mac EditionRadeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
174 GB/s
176 GB/s+1%
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R9 M295X Mac EditionRadeon R9 M395
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
20.0
65.8+229%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition came in at $450, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395 was 33.3% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 47.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M295X Mac EditionRadeon R9 M395
MSRP
$450
$300-33%
Performance per Dollar
11.1
16.4+48%
Codename
Amethyst
Release
November 23 2014
June 9 2015
Ranking
#436
#445

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.