
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 5300M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 5300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅22.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌194.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 250W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 5300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,044 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 4.069 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300M is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M carries 3 GB. Radeon RX 5300M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) — a 3.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 174 GB/s+4% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 98.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 85W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 59.3+197% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300M (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Codename | Amethyst | Navi 14 |
| Release | November 23 2014 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #436 | #442 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















