Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅2.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score	5,115+2%	5,000
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS	3.482 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition carries 2 GB. Arc A370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — a 55.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	174 GB/s+55%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 150.9% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
TDP	35W-86%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90	—
Perf/Watt	146.1+631%	20.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP	—	$450
Codename	DG2-128	Amethyst
Release	March 30 2022	November 23 2014
Ranking	#439	#436

Search Arc A370M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.