Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is positioned at rank 350 and the Radeon R9 M395X is on rank 391, so the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M395X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M395X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M395X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $450), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 207.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+207.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,120+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+18% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M395X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 8.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 174 GB/s+9% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 68.3+242% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M395X costs 66.7% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) vs 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 207.2% better value. The Radeon R9 M395X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-25% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $150-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 34.1+207% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Amethyst |
| Release | November 23 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #436 | #438 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and Radeon R9 M395X
