GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050

2016Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $340 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 311.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Draws 60W instead of 250W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014

Why buy it

  • 31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 309.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $450 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
  • 316.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 instead at 5,033 vs 5,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $340 cheaper on MSRP at $110 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 311.8% (45.8 vs 11.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050

The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 scores 5,033 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
5,033
5,000
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.862 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS+87%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
240 KB
512 KB+113%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — a 55.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
174 GB/s+55%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 122.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
TDP
60W-76%
250W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
65 C
Perf/Watt
83.9+320%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 came in at $110, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 was 75.6% cheaper ($340 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 312.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP
$110-76%
$450
Performance per Dollar
45.8+313%
11.1
Codename
GP107
Amethyst
Release
October 25 2016
November 23 2014
Ranking
#443
#436

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.