
GeForce GTX 1050 vs Tesla K8

GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:

Tesla K8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K8
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K8 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $100), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 118.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+118.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 and Tesla K8

GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 scores 5,033 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 is built on Pascal while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 811 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,033 | 5,111+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.862 TFLOPS | 2.491 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+72% | 811 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+88% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K8 has 4 GB. The Tesla K8 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 0.5 MB (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 draws 60W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-40% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.9+64% | 51.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Tesla K8 launched at $1000 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 55% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 51.1 (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 118.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-89% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-55% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.8+119% | 51.1 |
| Codename | GP107 | GK104 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | September 16 2014 |
| Ranking | #443 | #515 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












