
GeForce GTX 1050 vs Quadro

GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 is significantly newer (2016 vs 1999). The GeForce GTX 1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $50), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 11.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 and Quadro

GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 scores 5,033 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 is built on Pascal while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 14 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,033 | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Celsius |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 40+900% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 draws 60W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-20% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.9+26% | 66.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Quadro launched at $1000 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 100.0 (Quadro) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 11.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 1999).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-89% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-10% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.8+12% | 100.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | NV10 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #443 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












