Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050

CPU

GPU

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

GeForce GTX 1050

2016Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 140V

Shared 15

5,168

+2.7%

5,033

0.0%

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2024-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
218.2% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1050

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 209.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

GeForce GTX 1050

2016

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 209.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2024-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
218.2% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc Graphics 140V better than GeForce GTX 1050?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,168 vs 5,033 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc Graphics 140V is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 60W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 140V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016 and a 3nm process instead of 14nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc Graphics 140V is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Arc Graphics 140V is about 218.2% more expensive on MSRP at $350 MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1050 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1050 is 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 5,033 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 140V Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
1080p
low	85 FPS	114 FPS
medium	74 FPS	100 FPS
high	54 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	69 FPS	101 FPS
medium	60 FPS	85 FPS
high	40 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	47 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	40 FPS
medium	25 FPS	37 FPS
high	16 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	22 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 140V Open GeForce GTX 1050

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
1080p
low	121 FPS	129 FPS
medium	85 FPS	89 FPS
high	58 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	64 FPS
medium	48 FPS	43 FPS
high	35 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	24 FPS
medium	25 FPS	16 FPS
high	20 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	8 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 140V Open GeForce GTX 1050

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
1080p
low	233 FPS	226 FPS
medium	186 FPS	181 FPS
high	155 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	174 FPS	170 FPS
medium	140 FPS	136 FPS
high	116 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	116 FPS	113 FPS
medium	93 FPS	91 FPS
high	78 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	57 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 140V Open GeForce GTX 1050

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
1080p
low	141 FPS	226 FPS
medium	109 FPS	162 FPS
high	88 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	104 FPS	170 FPS
medium	81 FPS	125 FPS
high	64 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	107 FPS
medium	49 FPS	74 FPS
high	40 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	48 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 140V Open GeForce GTX 1050

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 1050

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

GeForce GTX 1050

The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GeForce GTX 1050 reaches 5,033 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1050 uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1392 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
G3D Mark Score	5,168+3%	5,033
Architecture	Xe²	Pascal
Process Node	3 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	8	640+7900%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+47%	1392 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 140V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
VRAM Capacity	Shared	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	112 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050).

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1050's 60W — a 120% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65 C.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	GeForce GTX 1050
TDP	15W-75%	60W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	65 C-24%
Perf/Watt	344.5+311%	83.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 68.6% less ($240 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 45.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 209.5% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).