
GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M295X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M295X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $150), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 225.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+225.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 scores 5,033 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,033 | 5,150+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.862 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 512 KB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 57.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 176 GB/s+57% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 122.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-76% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.9+307% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 34.3 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 225.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-63% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-70% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.8+226% | 34.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | Amethyst |
| Release | October 25 2016 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #443 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















