Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro

1999

Why buy it

✅Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M395 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
233.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅72.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 228.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M395 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 72.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro instead at 5,000 vs 4,934, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M395 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $700 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 228.9% (16.4 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 220 nm vs 28 nm.

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score	5,000+1%	4,934
Architecture	Celsius	GCN
Process Node	220 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: MPEG-2 Acceleration vs VCE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Quadro) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
Encoder	None	UVD
Decoder	MPEG-2 Acceleration	VCE
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	66.7+1%	65.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro came in at $1000, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395 was 70% cheaper ($700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (Quadro) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 228% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 1999).

Feature	Quadro	Radeon R9 M395
MSRP	$1000	$300-70%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	16.4+228%
Codename	NV10	—
Release	1999	June 9 2015
Ranking	#900	#445

Search Quadro on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.