FirePro W7100 vs Quadro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs Quadro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs Quadro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅FirePro W7100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs Quadro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 28 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065+1% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Celsius |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 112+2700% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro carries 2 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 64-bit on the Quadro.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8 | 66.7+97% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the Quadro launched at $1000. On MSRP, FirePro W7100 was 20.1% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the FirePro W7100 offers 26% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W7100 (2014 vs 1999).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+26% | 5.0 |
| Codename | Tonga | NV10 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #406 | #900 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W7100 and Quadro
