Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X

NVIDIA

Quadro

1999Core: 135 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

2015Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro

1999

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 M395X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M395X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

  • 129.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 70.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M395X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 129.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (5,120 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M395X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.7% (8.5 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 220 nm vs 28 nm.

FeatureQuadroRadeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score
5,000
5,120+2%
Architecture
Celsius
GCN 3.0
Process Node
220 nm
28 nm
ROPs
4
32+700%
TMUs
4
128+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadroRadeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.

FeatureQuadroRadeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadroRadeon R9 M395X
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
66.7
68.3+2%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro came in at $1000, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395X was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (Quadro) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 70% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 1999).

FeatureQuadroRadeon R9 M395X
MSRP
$1000
$600-40%
Performance per Dollar
5.0
8.5+70%
Codename
NV10
Amethyst
Release
1999
May 5 2015
Ranking
#900
#438

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.