
Quadro

Radeon R9 M395X
Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 M395X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M395X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅129.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 220 nm vs 28 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,120+2% |
| Architecture | Celsius | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 28 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 4 | 128+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 68.3+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro came in at $1000, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395X was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (Quadro) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 70% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $600-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0 | 8.5+70% |
| Codename | NV10 | Amethyst |
| Release | 1999 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #900 | #438 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















