
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $871 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 693.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌675.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Costs $871 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 693.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌675.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB better than Quadro?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and Quadro

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 14 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116+2% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Celsius |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 24+500% | 4 |
| TMUs | 48+1100% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+2% | 66.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129 MSRP, while the Quadro launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB costs 87.1% less ($871 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 694% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the newer GPU (2018 vs 1999).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-87% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+694% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | NV10 |
| Release | May 21 2018 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #440 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













