Quadro vs RTXA5000-8Q
Quadro
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro is positioned at rank 215 and the RTXA5000-8Q is on rank 295, so the Quadro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-8Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 1999). The RTXA5000-8Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-8Q.
| Insight | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-8Q, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 4985.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4985.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro and RTXA5000-8Q
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 220 nm vs 8 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+2% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Celsius | Ampere |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 8 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 96+2300% |
| TMUs | 4 | 256+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7+212% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $2500. The Quadro costs 98% less ($2450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Quadro) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the Quadro offers 4900% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-60% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-98% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0+4900% | 2.0 |
| Codename | NV10 | GA102 |
| Release | 1999 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #900 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro and RTXA5000-8Q
