Quadro vs Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro is positioned at rank 215 and the Radeon RX 5300M is on rank 41, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 1999). The Radeon RX 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro.
| Insight | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro and Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 220 nm vs 7 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,044 |
| Architecture | Celsius | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 7 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 4 | 88+2100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M has 3 GB. The Radeon RX 5300M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7+12% | 59.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | NV10 | Navi 14 |
| Release | 1999 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #900 | #442 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro and Radeon RX 5300M
