Arc A370M vs Quadro

Arc A370M vs Quadro Performance Spectrum

Arc A370M

4 GB 35

5,115

+2.3%

5,000

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs Quadro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs Quadro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅133.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Quadro

1999

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 133.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 220nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 1999. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs Quadro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 6 nm vs 220 nm.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
G3D Mark Score	5,115+2%	5,000
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Celsius
Process Node	6 nm	220 nm
ROPs	32+700%	4
TMUs	64+1500%	4

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro carries 2 GB. Arc A370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 64-bit on the Quadro.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	None
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	MPEG-2 Acceleration
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	90	—
Perf/Watt	146.1+119%	66.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 1999).

Feature	Arc A370M	Quadro
MSRP	—	$1000
Codename	DG2-128	NV10
Release	March 30 2022	1999
Ranking	#439	#900

Search Arc A370M on Amazon

Search Quadro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.