Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 270X

2013

Why buy it

  • 13.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 48.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 270X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M395 instead at 4,934 vs 4,874, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 270X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 48.9% (24.5 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score
4,874
4,934+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1792+40%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 1.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s+2%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (FL12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
Encoder
VCE 1.0
UVD
Decoder
UVD 4.2
VCE
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
TDP
180W
75W-58%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
109mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80 C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
27.1
65.8+143%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 270X came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270X was 33.7% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 49.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon R9 M395
MSRP
$199-34%
$300
Performance per Dollar
24.5+49%
16.4
Codename
Curacao
Release
October 8 2013
June 9 2015
Ranking
#448
#445

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.