
Radeon R9 270X

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅13.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874 | 4,934+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 1.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s+2% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 109mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1 | 65.8+143% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 270X came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270X was 33.7% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 49.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-34% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5+49% | 16.4 |
| Codename | Curacao | — |
| Release | October 8 2013 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #448 | #445 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














